does anyone else see an interesting dichotomy between the content and the ‘dogma’ of street photography?
does anyone else see an interesting dichotomy between the content and the 'dogma' of street photography? I really love flickr, and although I'm not really much into creating "street photography" a lot of my favorite flickr groups are 'street groups', you know the ones where almost every picture is some crazy story that's coming through in an instant. Incidentally, these photos are almost never captioned or named or anything, which almost seems like...